Parental Handbook
For Parents Dedicated to Local Control
of Public Education of Children
According to the Constitution

 
xi
Introduction
Previous Next

 

Comprehensive Anatomy of

Carlin v. Board of Education

A Thirty-Year California "Desegregation" Class Action,
Superior Court of San Diego County, No. 303800

Kari Carlin, et al., Plaintiffs
v.
Board of Education, San Diego Unified School District,
Defendant;

Groundswell, et al., Intervenors

 

See particularly events where Groundswell parents filed amici curiae briefs when faced with the Dilemma (direct or indirect) of court orders, sought of their board in the Carlin case, directly affecting them; or sought in other "desegregation" class actions versus boards of education which could indirectly affect them by stare decisis application of precedents. Events in this "anatomy" are detailed in Liberate Public Schools from Government by Lawsuit (LPS) at the pages indicated.
 

June 27, 1963

 

Jackson v. Pasadena City School Dist., 59 Cal.2d 876,881. Dictum: “(T)hat school boards take steps, insofar as reasonably feasible, to alleviate racial imbalance in schools regardless of its cause.”
 

December 4, 1967

Carlin

 

Plaintiffs, a group of students of diverse races, including “Caucasian,” filed this action against the Defendant Board of Education to “Integrate the San Diego School System.” The White enrollment was then 76 percent.
 

December 7, 1973

Carlin

 

The Court determined the existence of a class action and described the class as “(a)ll students attending the San Diego Unified School District and their parents and legal guardians who believe that said schools should be Next
 


To facilitate referencing, online pagination matches the printed book.


Jackson   Jackson v. Pasadena City School Dist., 59 Cal.2d 876 (1963)
Pasadena, California
 
Carlin  Carlin v. Board of Education, San Diego Unified School District,
San Diego Superior Court No. 303800 (1967-1998)
San Diego, California
Enstrom: pro bono counsel, 1979-1998
 
   Board of Education v. Superior Court, 61 Cal.App.4th 411 (Feb.1998)
[conclusion of Carlin v. Board of Education]
San Diego, California
Enstrom: pro bono counsel
 
         

Handbook: Anatomy, pages xi - xvii —

Previous Next
  

Parental Handbook
For Parents Dedicated to Local Control
of Public Education of Children
According to the Constitution
by Elmer Enstrom, Jr.
Contents
Challenges of the 30-year Carlin affirmative action lawsuit:
an exemplar of citizens reasserting Constitutional rights.
  
© 1998-2006, 2013 Enstrom Foundation www.EnstromFoundation.org Bookmark and Share