Busing —Not Integration— Opposed: Invoke Our Color-Blind Constitution to End It
Appendices
Titles of appendices are listed online for reference. The appendices in the printed book, print-only pages 136 — 151, are photocopies of busing-case related documents, or excerpts from documents, whose substance is developed in the body of the book.
I.   Article by author entitled Busing, Not Integration, Opposed, published on September 18, 1977, in The San Diego Union   print 136   II.   Article I, Section 7(a), of the California Constitution, as amended (by initiative Proposition 1) November 6, 1979   print 139           III.   Title page of Application of Petitioners in Crawford v. Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles for leave to Appear and to File a Brief Amici Curiae in Support of the Unconstitutionality of the Recent Amendment (Proposition 1) on the November 6, 1979 Ballot to Article 1, Section 7(a) of the California Constitution, etc. (Application granted January 3, 1980, in San Bernardino Superior Court) No. 155286   print 140           IV.   Ruling, dated Feb. 20, 1980, by San Bernardino Superior Court Judge Paul Egly denying Application of Groundswell, et al. (to appear as amici curiae and interested persons) in National Assoc. for the Advancement of Colored People, et al. v. San Bernardino Unified Sch. Dist., No. 155286   print 141           V.   Excerpt (excerpted exemplar from petitions of San Diego students objecting to racial school assignments) from Declaration of Larry Lester; Intervenors' Exhibit 6 for Identification, on July 16, 1981, in Carlin v. Board of Education   print 142           VI.   Title page of Brief of Intervenors (Groundswell, et al) in Carlin v. Board of Education San Diego Unified School District as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner for Reversal, together with portion of brief entitled Interest of Amici Curiae and Summary of Argument, submitted May 11, 1990, to the Supreme Court in The Board of Education of Oklahoma City Public Schools, etc., Petitioner, v. Robert L. Dowell, et al., Respondents, on Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, No. 89-1080   print 143           VII.   Title page of Brief of Intervenors (Groundswell, et al) in Carlin v. Board of Education, San Diego Unified School District as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners, together with portion of brief entitled Summary of Argument, submitted May 1, 1991, to the Supreme Court in Robert R. Freeman, et al., Petitioners, v. Willie Eugene Pitts, et al., on Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 89-1290   print 149
Carlin	Carlin v. Board of Education, San Diego Unified School District, San Diego Superior Court No. 303800 (1967-1998) San Diego, California Enstrom: pro bono counsel, 1979-1998
Crawford I	Crawford v. Board of Education, 17 Cal.3d 280 (1976) Los Angeles, California
	N.A.A.C.P. v. San Bernardino Unified Sch. Dist., Superior Court No. 155286 (1979) San Bernardino, California Enstrom: submitted amici curiae brief (denied by judge)
Dowell	Dowell v. Bd. of Educ. of Okl. City Public Schools, (10th Cir. 1989), 890 F.2d 1483 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Enstrom: filed amici curiae brief
Freeman	Freeman v. Pitts, 112 S.Ct. 1430 (1992) DeKalb County School System (DCSS), DeKalb County, Georgia Enstrom: filed amici curiae brief
List of referenced Rights Cases by Title
List of referenced Rights Cases by Date
	[ Busing: list of print-only pages 136 - 151 ]
Busing —Not Integration— Opposed Invoke our Color-Blind Constitution to End It A Reasoned Opposition to Race-Based Affirmative Action in Public Schools by Elmer Enstrom, Jr. Contents History of the 30-year Carlin affirmative action lawsuit: a pro bono case history of applying Constitutional principles.    © 1998-2006, 2013 Enstrom Foundation www.EnstromFoundation.org